The audibility of teachers and peers is an essential factor in determining the academic performance of school children. However, acoustic conditions in physical education settings are less than optimal and have been viewed as “hostile listening environments” that undermine the learning of children in school. While typical classroom teachers are faced with many voice concerns, gymnasiums with poor acoustics, covered areas, and outdoor teaching environments can be more challenging to the voices of physical education teachers. They often rely on shouting instructions over noises and hope their students will hear and understand. This article reviews current acoustic research in classrooms and in physical education settings and future actions designed to improve sound issues and their related policies.


Acoustics Sound Policy Sports


  1. F. Berg, J. Blair, & P. Benson, Classroom acoustics: The problem, impact, and solution, Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 27 (1996) 16-20.
  2. C. Crandell, Noise effects on the speech recognition of children with minimal hearing loss, Ear and Hearing, 7 (1993) 210–217.
  3. M. Klatte, & J. Hellbruck, J. Seidel, & P. Leistner, Effects of classroom acoustics on performance and well-being in elementary school children: A field study, Environment and Behavior, 42 (2010) 659-692.
  4. D. James, M. Stead, D. Clifton-Brown, & D. Scott, (2012) A cost benefit analysis of providing a “sound” environment in educational facilities, In Proceedings of the Acoustical Society of Australia, Fremantle, pp. 21–24.
  5. S. Ryan, & L.L. Mendel, Acoustics in physical education settings: The learning roadblock, Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 15 (2010). 71–83.
  6. G. Jurak, M. Kovač, G. Starc, B. Leskošek, Acoustics in School Sport Halls and Its Implications for Physical Education, Croatian Journal of Education, 17 (2015) 65-95.
  7. S. Ryan, T. Ormond, C. Imwold, & R.J. Rotunda, The effects of a public address system on the offtask behavior of elementary physical education students, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35 (2002) 305-308.
  8. Ryan, S. (2009). The effects of a sound-field amplification system on management time in middle school physical education settings, Journal of Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(2), 131-137.
  9. S. Ryan, R. Rotunda, C. Song & M. Maina, The prevalence and impact of voice problems among physical education teachers, The Physical Educator, 69 (2012) 308-322.
  10. S. Ryan, D. Grube, & M. Mokgwati, Signal-tonoise ratio in physical education settings, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81 (2010) 524-528.
  11. J.J. Smaldino, New developments in classroom acoustics and amplifications, Audiology Today, 23 (2011) 30-36
  12. A. Boothroyd, Characteristics of listening environments: Benefits of binaural hearing and implications for bilateral management, International Journal of Audiology, 45 (2006) 12- 19.
  13. T. Finitzo-Hieber, (1988) Classroom acoustics. In R. Roeser (Ed.), Auditory disorders in school children (2nd ed. pp. 221-233).). New York: Thieme-Stratton.
  14. A. Boothroyd, (2005) Modeling the effects of room acoustics on speech reception and perception. In C.C. Crandell, J.J. Smaldino, and C. Flexer, (Eds.), Sound Field amplification: Applications to speech perception and classroom acoustics 2nd Ed., (pp. 23-48). Clifton Park, NY; Thomson Delmar Learning.
  15. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Acoustics in educational settings: Technical report. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy.
  16. G. Rosenberg, P. Blake-Rahter, J. Heavner, L. Allen, B. Redmond, & J. Phillips, Improving classroom acoustics (ICA): A three year FM sound-field classroom amplification study, Journal of Educational Audiology, 7 (1999) 8-28
  17. C. Flexer, J. Millin, & L. Brown, Children with developmental disabilities: The effect of sound field amplification on word identification, Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 21 (1990) 177–182.
  18. S.W. Leung, & B. McPherson, Classrooms for Children with Developmental Disabilities: Soundfield and public address amplification systems compared, International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 53 (2006) 287-299.
  19. R. Massie, D. Theodoros, B. McPherson & J. Smaldino, Sound-field amplification: Enhancing the classroom listening environment for aboriginal and torres strait islander children, The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 33 (2004) 47-53.
  20. K. Anderson, 'Kids in noisy classrooms: What does the research really say?', Journal of Educational Audiology, 9 (2001) 21–33.
  21. A. Eriks-Brophy, & H. Ayukawa, The benefits of sound field amplification in classrooms of Inuit students of Nunavik: A pilot project, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31 (2000) 324–335
  22. C. Crandell, Effects of sound field amplification on the speech perception of ESL children. Educational Audiology Monograph, 4 (1996) 1–5.
  23. C. Crandell, & J. Smaldino, Speech perception in noise by children for whom English is a second language, American Journal of Audiology, 5 (1996) 47–51.
  24. K.T. Mealings, K. Demuth, J.M. Buchholz, & H. Dillon, The effect of different open plan and enclosed classroom acoustic conditions on speech perception in Kindergarten children, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138 (2015a), 2458-2469.
  25. K.T. Mealings, K. Demuth, J.M. Buchholz & H. Dillon, The development of the Mealings, Demuth, Dillon, and Buchholz Classroom Speech Perception Test', Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58 (2015b) 1350-1362.
  26. K.T. Mealings, J.M. Buchholz, K. Demuth, & H. Dillon, Investigating the acoustics of a sample of open plan and enclosed Kindergarten classrooms in Australia, Applied Acoustics, 100 (2015) 95-105.
  27. American National Standards Institute, (2002) Acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools (ANSI S12.60-2002), New York: ANSI.
  28. C. Crandell, & J.J. Smaldino, Classroom acoustics for children with normal hearing and with hearing impairment, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31 (2000) 362-370.
  29. M. Picard, and J. Bradley, Revisiting speech interference in classrooms, Audiology, 40 (2001) 221-244.
  30. C. Crandell, The effects of classroom amplification on children with normal hearing: Implications for intervention strategies, Educational Audiology Monograph, 2 (1991) 18-38.
  31. S. Painter & T. Frank, (1999, December), Ambient noise levels in infant/toddler rooms in daycare centers, Poster session presented at the Convention of the AAA, Miami, FL.
  32. H.A. Knecht, P.B. Nelson, G.M. Whitelaw & L.L. Feth, Background noise levels and reverberation times in unoccupied classrooms: Predictions and measurements, American Journal of Audiology, 11 (2002) 65-71.
  33. J. Cunningham, T. Nicol, S.G. Zecker, A. Bradlow, & N. Kraus, Neurobiological responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems. Clinical Neurophysiology, 11 (2001) 758-767.
  34. C. Crandell, & J.J. Smaldino, An update of classroom acoustics for children with hearing impairment, The Volta Review, 96 (1994) 291– 306.
  35. M. Picard, & C. Boudreau, (1998) Characteristics of the noise found in daycare centers, Paper presented at the meeting of ASA-EAA-DEGA, Berlin, Germany.
  36. T. Frank, M.V. Golden, & E.E. Manlove, (2001, April). Acoustical conditions in infant/toddler daycare classrooms, Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.
  37. Y. Ueda, & Y. Ando, Effects of air conditioning on sound propagation in a large space, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102 (1997) 2771- 2770.
  38. H. Yoo The room acoustics of gymnasium building, Russian-Korean International Symposium of Science and Technology, 3 (2001) 35 – 38.
  39. T. Jiang, (1997) Can noise levels at School Gymnasia cause hearing loss: A case study of a physical education teacher, Paper presented at the Noise-Con 97 Meeting, State College, PA.
  40. J. Nash, (2004) Hearing conservation in construction; many people complain about noise hazards in the construction industry, Will OSHA be able to do anything about it? Occupational Hazards, 66, 73.
  41. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): A proposed national strategy for the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss. In Proposed National Strategies for the Prevention of Leading Work-Related Diseases and Injuries (Part 2). Cincinnati, Ohio: Association of Schools of Public Health/NIOSH, 1988.
  42. F.S. Berg, (1993) Acoustics and sound systems in schools. San Diego, CA: Singular.
  43. S. Ryan, & B. Yerg, The effects of crossgroup feedback on off-task behavior in a physical education setting, Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 20 (2001) 172-188.
  44. E. Smith, H.L. Kirchner, M. Taylor, H. Hoffman, & J.H. Lemke, Voice problems among teachers: Differences by gender and teaching characteristics, Journal of Voice, 12 (1998) 328– 334.
  45. J.A. Mattiske, J.M. Oates, & K.M. Greenwood, Vocal problems among teachers: A review of prevalence, causes, prevention, and treatment, Journal of Voice, 12 (1998) 489–499.
  46. K. Verdolini, & L.O. Ramig, Review: Occupational risks for voice problems, Logopedics, Phoniatrics, and Vocology, 26 (2001) 37–46.
  47. C. Chiang, and C. Lai, Acoustical environment evaluation of joint classrooms for elementary schools in Taiwan, Building Environment, 43 (2008) 1619–1632
  48. C.E. Johnson, Children’s phoneme identification in reverberation and noise, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43 (2000) 144- 157.
  49. J. Smaldino, & C. Flexer, (1991, June). Improving listening in the classroom. Paper presented at the 1991 Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology Annual Meeting, Breckenridge, CO.
  50. P. Zannin, & D. Zwirtes, Evaluation of the acoustic performance of classrooms in public schools, Applied Acoustics, 70 (2009) 625–635.
  51. American National Standards Institute (2010) American National Standard Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for Schools, (ANSI/ASA S12.60- 2010/Part 1), New York: ANSI.
  52. Society of Health and Physical Educators, (2016) Appropriate instructional practice guidelines. Reston, VA 20191
  53. Society of Health and Physical Educators, (2009) National standards for K-12 physical education. Reston, VA 20191
  54. J.E. Dockrell, B. Shield, The impact of sound-field systems on learning and attention in elementary school classrooms, Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 55 (2012) 1163-1176.
  55. J. Wolfe & E.C. Schafer, Candidacy and device options: Personal amplification systems for school-aged children, Seminars in Hearing, 31, (2010) 203-218.
  56. C. Crandell, J.J. Smaldino, & C. Flexer, (2005) Sound-field applications:Applications to speech perception and classroom acoustics (2nd ed.), New York: Thomson.
  57. L.L. Mendel, R.A. Roberts, & J.H. Walton, Speech perception benefits from sound field FM amplification, American Journal of Audiology, 12 (2003) 114-124.