The aim of this paper is to use a training load quantification tool (RPE) to evaluate if the training load programmed by the coach is appropriate to the characteristics of these footballers. The study was conducted at the football section of the Sale Sports Association, Morocco, on a sample of 8 football players who practice in the club of the Association, aged between 18 and 21 years, the study was established during a mesocycle in a period from 18/03/2019 to 20/04/2019. For the quantification of the training load (TL) we chose the (RPE) tool, where each footballer must give his own perception of the effort felt in each training session, taking into consideration also the duration of the session. This will allow us to calculate the intensity of the session estimated, on a scale from 0 to 10. Based on the results of the quantification of training load for the 8 footballers, we note that in the majority of the cases, the acute load (AL) is higher than the chronic load (CL) at the end of each week. On the other hand, for the monotony index (MI) that provides information on the negative adaptations of training and overtraining, we note that it present a high value among the majority of footballers (1.8UA<2.1UA). For the average of the ratio of the training load: acute/chronic, we note that for the first three footballers the training loads are higher compared to the others. The monitoring training load help to better conceptualize the adaptations of the athlete to the training, and also allows the prediction of the performance.


Morocco, Training loads, Football, Injuries, Overtraining,


  1. Hägglund, Martin, Markus Waldén, and Jan Ekstrand, Injury incidence and distribution in elite football—a prospective study of the Danish and the Swedish top divisions, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 15 (2005) 21-28.
  2. A. Ben Belgith, S. Ahmaidi, P. Maille, P. Noirez, F.D. Desgorces, Quantification de la charge d’entraînement imposée au footballeur professionnel en phase de réhabilitation athlétique post-blessure, Science & Sports 27 (2012) 169-174.
  3. Meeusen R, Duclos M, Foster C, Fry A, Gleeson M, Nie-Man D,et al. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: joint consensus statement of the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 45 (2013) 186-205.
  4. S.L. Halson, Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes, Sports Medicine, 44 (2014) 139-147.
  5. Tim J Gabbett, Billy T Hulin, Peter Blanch, Rod Whiteley, High training workloads alone do not cause sports injuries: how you get there is the real issue, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50 (2016) 444-445.
  6. Vladimir Nikolaevi? Platonov, L'entraînement sportif, théorie et méthodologie Broché – 1 janvier, Revue EPS (1988)
  7. A. Sedeaud, J.M. Sène, N. Krantz, G. Saulière, I. Moussa, J.F. Toussaint, L’importance de la quantification de la charge d’entraînement : exemple d’un modèle; The importance of quantifying training loads: A model example, Science & Sports 33 (2018) 22-32.
  8. Gunnar Borg, Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales. Human kinetics, 1998.
  9. C. Foster, Monitoring training in athletes with reference to overtraining syndrome, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 30 (1998) 1164-1168.
  10. Torbjørn Soligard, Martin Schwellnus, JuanManuel Alonso, Roald Bahr, Ben Clarsen, H Paul Dijkstra, Tim Gabbett, Michael Gleeson, Martin Hägglund, Mark R Hutchinson, Christa Janse van Rensburg, Karim M Khan, Romain Meeusen, John W Orchard, Babette M Pluim, Martin Raftery, Richard Budgett, Lars Engebretsen, How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50 (2016) 1030-1041.
  11. E.W. Banister, T.W. Clavert, M.V. Savage, and T. Bach, A systems model of training for athletic performance, Australian Journal of Sports Medicine, 7 (1975) 57–61.
  12. D.D. Brown, Pulmonary responses to exercise and training. In: Exercise and Sport Science. W.E. Garrett and D.T. Kirkendall, eds. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2000. pp. 117–134.
  13. T. Busso, C. Denis, R. Bonnefoy, A. Geyssant, and J.R. La- Cour, Modeling of adaptations to physical training by using a recursive least squares algorithm, Journal of Applied Physiology, 82 (1997) 1685–1693.
  14. J.R. Fitz-Clarake, R.H. Morton, and E.W. Banister, Optimizing athletic performance by influence curves, Journal of Applied Physiology, 71 (1991) 1151–1158.
  15. C. Foster, and M. Lehmann, Overtraining syndrome. In: Running Injuries. G. Guten, ed. Orlando: W.B. Saunders, Co., 1997. pp. 173– 188.
  16. R.H. Morton, J.R. Fitz-Clarke, E.W. Banister, Modeling human performance in running. Journal of Applied Physiology, 69 (1990) 1171– 1177.
  17. I. Mujika, T. Busso, L. Lacoste, F. Barale, A. Geyssant, J.C. Chatard, Modeled responses to training and taper in competitive swimmers, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 28 (1996) 252–258.
  18. C. Foster, J.A. Florhaug, J. Franklin, L. Gottschall, L.A. Hrovatin, S. Parker, P. Doleshal, C. Dodge, A new approach to monitoring exercise training, The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 15 (2001) 109-115.
  19. E. Rampinini, A.J. Coutts, C. Castagna, R. Sassi, F.M. Impellizzeri, Variation in top level soccer match performance, International Journal of Sports Medicine, 28 (2007) 1018-1024.
  20. F.M. Impellizzeri, E. Rampinini, S.M. Marcora, Physiological assessment of aerobic training in soccer, Journal of Sports Sciences 23 (2005) 583-592.
  21. Alexandre Dellal, Karim Chamari, Del P. Wong, Said Ahmaidi, Dominique Keller, Ricardo Barros, Gian Nicola Bisciotti & Christopher Carling, Comparison of physical and technical performance in European soccer match-play: FA Premier League and La Liga, European Journal of Sport Science 11 (2011) 51-59.