The diagnosis of morphological characteristics is an integral part of the entire training process in sports. This study aimed to determine the influence of morphological characteristics on the ball's speed of movement after the shoot from a spot and movement in handball. The sample included 36 female handball players aged 14.33 years. The predictor set consisted of 10 morphological variables. In comparison, the three variables constituted the criterion variables by which the ball's speed of movement was determined after different ways of shooting. Using regression analysis, it was found that the predictor set of variables explains about 70% of the variance for all three criterion variables. Individually, a statistically significant and positive influence on the speed of movement of the ball after the shot was recorded at the height and weight of the body, while a negative effect was observed for the variables; arm length, leg length and skin fold on the abdomen. Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that morphological characteristics significantly influence the speed of movement of the ball after a shot in the handball, which can significantly contribute to the selection of handball players, as well as in establishing the tactics of handball, especially in situations where one shot decides the match. Also, the obtained results indicate the necessity of considering the age characteristics of the female respondents, that is, the need to adjust the training process to the period of intensive growth and development.


Body kinematics Levers elevation angle Quasi-cyclical movements


  1. I. Terzić, B. Gardašević, Relations of constitutional characteristics and motoric abilities of Serbia and Montenefro and Montenegro, Sport Mont, 9 (2011) 69-75.
  2. S. Jaric, S, D. Ugarkovic, M. Kukolj, Anthropometric, strength, power and flexibility variables in elite male athletes: Basketball, handball, soccer and volleyball players, Journal of Human Movement Studies, 40 (2001) 453–464.
  3. D. Hatzimanouil, N. Oxizoglou, Evaluation of the morphological characteristics and motor skills in the national junior handball teams of Greece and Yugoslavia, Journal of Human Movement Studies, 46 (2004) 125–140.
  4. H. Mohamed, R. Vaeyens, S. Matthys, M. Multael, J. Lefevre, M. Lenoir, R. Philippaerts, Anthropometric and performance measures for the development of a talent detection and identification model in youth handball, Journal of Sports Sciences, 27 (2009) 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802482417
  5. S. Karišik, S. Goranović, Z. Valdevit, Mogućnost selekcije vrhunskih rukometaša u zavisnosti od antropometrijskih karakteristika. [In Serbian]. Sport i zdravlje, 6 (2011) 60-66.
  6. B. Gardašević, I. Terzić, Pokazatelji situacione efikasnosti na Šampionatu Evrope u rukometu za Žene 2010. [In Serbian], Sport Mont, 9 (2011) 231-237.
  7. V. Stanković, J. Malacko, I. Bojić, J. Ilić, Relations between morphological variables and normal and pathological conative characteristics of handball players, SportLogia, 9(2) (2013) 89-99.http://dx.doi.org/10.5550/sgia.130902.en.004S
  8. A. Chaouachi, M. Brughelli, G. Levin, N.B. Boudhina, J. Cronin, K. Chamar, Anthropometric, physiological and performance characteristics of elite lean handball players, Journal of Sports Science, 27 (2009) 151-157.https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802448731
  9. L. T. Ronglan, T. Raastad, A. Borgesen, Neuromuscular fatigueand recovery in elite female handball players, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 16 (2006) 276-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2005.00474.x
  10. N. Rogulj, N. Foretić, V. Srhoj, M. Čavala, V. Papić, Uticaj nekih motoričkih sposobnosti na brzinu lopte kod udarca u rukometu. [In Serbian], Acta Kinesiologica, 1(2) (2007) 71-75.
  11. B. Serrien, R. Clijsen, J. Blondeel, M. Goossens, J.P. Baeyens, Differences in ball speed and three-dimensional kinematics between male and female handball players during a standing throw with run-up, BSM Sports Science, Medicine & Rehabilitation, 18 (2015) 4-12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2Fs13102-015-0021-x
  12. M. Marfell-Jones, T. Olds, A.Stew, L. Carter, International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. Australia: The International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry. (2006).
  13. N. Foretić, O. Uljević, A. Prižmić, Some metric characteristic of tests to assess ball speed during overarm throw performance, SportLogia, 6(2) (2010) 59-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5550/sgia.1002059
  14. A. Yapici, M. Ozkol, B. Ozçaldıran, M. Ergun, The relationship between throwing velocity with and without leg movements and isokinetic muscle strength in elite water polo players, European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 3(1) (2017) 42-51. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.266161
  15. Rules of the handball game from 2016. www.zrsizp.rh
  16. N. Kurelić, K. Momirović, M. Stojanović, Ž. Radojević, N. Viskić-Štalec, Structure and development of morphological and motor dimensions of youth. [In Serbian]. Beograd; Institute for Scientific Research. Faculty of Physical Education. (1975).
  17. M. Vukotić, The level of morphological characteristics, motor and functional abilities of athletes of different sports orientation. [In Serbian]. Unpublished master's thesis. Nikšić: Faculty of Sports and Physical Education. (2010).
  18. W. D. Mcleod, S. C. Hunter, B. Etchison, Performance measurement and Percent body fat in high-school. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 11 (1983) 390-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658301100603
  19. T. J. Gabbett, Science of Rugby league football, a review, Journal of Sports Science, 23 (2005) 961-976.https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400023381