International Journal of Physical Education, Fitness and Sports

Lifestyle Behaviours and Well-Being among Working Professional Students: A Narrative Review

Sangram Shivaji Bhakare — 2026-09-28

Background: Working professional students combine paid employment with formal higher education and often with caregiving responsibilities, yet remain underrepresented in lifestyle research and are frequently subsumed within general student samples. Objective: This narrative review synthesises evidence on physical activity, sedentary behaviour, dietary behaviour, sleep, and stress, burnout and well-being among working professional students and related employed student groups, and integrates the findings into a testable conceptual model. Methods: Guided by the SANRA criteria for narrative reviews, PubMed/PMC, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC and Google Scholar were searched from database inception to March 2026 using defined Boolean strings, English-language limits and pre-specified eligibility criteria. Approximately sixty records were assessed in full text, and thirty-nine sources informed the thematic synthesis. No statistical pooling was undertaken, and direct evidence was drawn from employed or working students. Results: Work–study demands appear to shape lifestyle largely indirectly, through time pressure, role conflict, boundary permeability and reduced recovery opportunity. The most direct evidence concerns work–study conflict, stress, burnout and well-being; findings for sedentary behaviour, dietary behaviour and physical activity are substantially extrapolated from general student or adult populations and are labelled as such. Employment is not uniformly harmful: where schedules are predictable, job–study congruence is high and institutional support exists, financial and developmental benefits may buffer strain. Conclusion: A coordinated, multicomponent approach coupling individual behaviour change with institutional and workplace scheduling reform is warranted, and the framework should be tested longitudinally within defined working-student subgroups rather than undifferentiated student samples.

From Discovery to Decision Impact in Precision Sports Medicine: A Review-Level Translational Evidence Map

Kishore Kanna R — 2026-09-15

Precision sports medicine now integrates genetic, molecular, wearable, imaging, biomechanical, and artificial intelligence data. However, it is still unclear how strong the evidence must be to inform judgments about athlete management. Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science across six predetermined categories, this study created a structured review-level translational evidence map. Of the 7,147 unique records that underwent title and abstract screening after deduplication, 944 were retained as potentially eligible. Athlete relevance, precision-domain fit, complementarity, recency, domain coverage, and redundancy management were then used to prioritize a prespecified principal corpus of 75 peer-reviewed systematic reviews and meta-analyses. These 75 reviews do not represent the entire set of eligible reviews. The corpus was finalized by a single author/reviewer who applied predefined review-level grades for translational maturity, consistency, replication, evidentiary confidence, and decision/clinical utility. In the prioritized corpus, 11 reviews attained R2, 21 reached C2, 1 reached EC3, and 11 reached T3. 74 of 75 remained at CU0-CU1, and none made it to T4-T5. Certain wearable, imaging, and neuromuscular applications produced the strongest validation signals. Where biomarker specificity, candidate-gene heterogeneity, calibration, and external transportability were uncertain, translation was weaker. Sensitivity analyses restricted to recent, methods-rich, and meta-analytic reviews yielded the same general conclusion. Evidence of demonstrated decision impact has not advanced as quickly as measurement and prediction. Thus, independent replication, intended-use-specific validation, calibration, incremental value, and potential athlete-management outcomes should be given more weight in future research.

Screen Time, Sedentary Behavior, Body Mass Index, Sleep Quality, and Psychological Well-Being Among University Students: a Cross-Sectional Study

Bhairu Singh Yadav — 2026-09-07

Background: Screen use, sedentary behavior, body mass index (BMI), and sleep are plausible correlates of psychological well-being in university students, but their independent associations and possible gender differences remain inconsistent across studies. Methods: This cross-sectional survey included 49 university students recruited by convenience sampling at a single institution (36 men, 13 women; mean age 20.23 ± 2.06 years). Screen time and daily sitting time were self-reported in ordered categories and coded using category midpoints. BMI was calculated from self-reported height and weight. Psychological well-being was assessed using the WHO-5 Well-Being Index. A study-specific sleep-quality composite was derived from sleep duration, sleep latency, and sleep disturbance items. Associations were examined using Pearson and Spearman correlations, Welch independent-samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and multiple linear regression. Results: Screen time (r = −0.092, p = 0.531), sitting time (r = −0.018, p = 0.902), and BMI (r = −0.031, p = 0.836) were not significantly associated with WHO-5 well-being. The study-specific sleep-quality composite showed a positive bivariate association with well-being (r = 0.346, p = 0.015), although its internal consistency was poor (Cronbach’s α = 0.24). No statistically significant gender differences were detected for screen time, sitting time, BMI, sleep quality, or well-being (all p > 0.29). The screen time × gender interaction was not significant (B = −3.58, SE = 6.56, 95% CI [−16.80, 9.64], p = 0.588). The multivariable model was not significant overall (R² = 0.136, p = 0.275); sleep quality was the only individual coefficient reaching p < 0.05 (B = 0.693, p = 0.032). An exploratory uncorrected inverse association between screen time and BMI was observed (r = −0.320, p = 0.027). Conclusion: In this small, gender-imbalanced sample, there was no statistically significant evidence that screen time, sedentary sitting time, or BMI were associated with psychological well-being. Findings concerning sleep quality and the exploratory screen time–BMI association require cautious interpretation because of measurement limitations, multiple testing, and limited statistical power.

Effects of Project-Based and Deep Learning Pedagogy on Dribbling Skills in Physical Education Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Ramadhan Arifin — 2026-08-15

This study examined the effectiveness of integrating Project-Based Learning (PjBL) with a deep learning approach to improve university students’ dribbling skills. A quantitative quasi-experimental method with a nonequivalent control group pretest–posttest design was employed. The participants were 70 students enrolled in the Physical Education Study Program at Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, consisting of 35 students in the experimental group and 35 in the control group. The experimental group received PjBL integrated with mindful, meaningful, reflective, collaborative, and joyful learning principles, whereas the control group received conventional instruction. Dribbling performance was assessed using an instrument adapted from the Modified Illinois Change-of-Direction Test with Ball, measuring change-of-direction speed, ball control, foot–ball contact, visual attention, and the ability to avoid contact with cones. The experimental group’s mean score increased from 69.09 at pretest to 79.69 at posttest, while the control group’s mean score increased from 69.09 to 71.31. Analysis of covariance, with posttest score as the dependent variable and pretest score as the covariate, revealed a significant group effect after controlling for initial ability, F(1, 67) = 287.29, p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.811. The adjusted posttest mean was significantly higher in the experimental group (M = 79.69, SE = 0.35) than in the control group (M = 71.31, SE = 0.35), with an adjusted mean difference of 8.37 points, 95% CI [7.39, 9.36]. These findings indicate that integrating PjBL with a deep learning approach produced a substantial improvement in university students’ dribbling skills.

Sense of Belonging in Undergraduate Physical Education and Recreation Students: An Examination of Academic Programs, Classification, and Transfer Status

YuChun Chen — 2026-09-17

Sense of belonging in the campus community has been identified as a critical factor in persistence and retention in college students. This study aimed to examine sense of belonging in physical education (PE) and recreation, park & nonprofit administration (RPNA) undergraduate students. A 34-item survey consisting of six categories was used to collect data. Findings revealed that (a) PE majors had greater peer support, felt more comfortable in the classroom and less isolated in the learning environment, thought the extracurricular activities and bulletin board information were more helpful, and experienced a greater overall sense of belonging than RPNA majors, (b) freshmen and seniors experienced a greater sense of belonging than sophomores, (c) seniors reported greater peer support than sophomores, (d) sophomores felt less comfortable in the classroom than everyone else, (e) sophomores felt more isolated than freshmen and seniors, and (f) nontransfer students felt the information on the bulletin board made them feel more connected to their peers of the same major than transfer students. Results suggested that college students regardless of major, classification and transfer status could benefit from additional in- and out-of-class activities, caring and compassionate demeanor from faculty members, and better use of the bulletin board to direct attention to their classmates, events, and news.

Association of Sleep Quality, Screen Time, and Physical Activity with Health-Related Quality of Life among Rural and Urban Athletes: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Owais Ahmad Baba — 2026-09-15

Sleep quality, screen time, and physical activity are modifiable behaviors linked to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in athletes, but rural–urban comparisons among athletes remain limited. This cross-sectional study compared sleep quality, screen time, physical activity, and HRQoL between rural (n=100) and urban (n=100) athletes aged 18-30 years, and examined how these behaviors relate to HRQoL. Sleep quality, physical activity, screen time, and HRQoL were assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), International Physical Activity Questionnaire–Short Form (IPAQ-SF), Android Digital Wellbeing, and WHOQOL-BREF. Independent-samples t-tests, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regression (α = .05) were used. Compared with urban athletes, rural athletes reported better sleep quality (PSQI M = 4.80 vs. 6.11, d = 0.72), lower screen time (3.16 vs. 4.56 h/day, d = 1.22), higher physical activity (3,778 vs. 2,835 MET-min/week, d = 0.82), and higher HRQoL (71.01 vs. 64.70, d = 1.05; all p < .001). HRQoL correlated negatively with PSQI (r = −.54) and screen time (r = −.53), and positively with physical activity (r = .42; all p < .001). After adjusting for residence, age, and sex, PSQI, screen time, and physical activity remained independent predictors of the investigator-derived Global HRQoL composite (all p < .001), and the model explained 56.7% of variance (adjusted R² = .554); the residence effect became non-significant once these behaviors were entered. These findings suggest sleep quality, screen time, and physical activity are associated with the rural–urban HRQoL gap among athletes and may be modifiable targets for residence-sensitive lifestyle interventions, pending longitudinal confirmation.

Artificial Intelligence in Sports Science: Evidence Maturity, Athlete Digital Twins, Multimodal Analytics, and a Translation Agenda for 2026–2035

Akila S — 2026-08-29

rtificial intelligence is increasingly used in sports science, sports medicine, athlete monitoring, physical education, biomechanics, coaching, and performance analysis. However, many studies report technical success without demonstrating whether an approach is transportable beyond the development setting, useful in professional practice, or adequately protective of athlete interests. This systematic scoping review examined peer-reviewed research published from January 2016 to May 1, 2026 on machine learning, deep learning, computer vision, wearable and multimodal analytics, large language models, generative artificial intelligence, and athlete digital twins. Six bibliographic databases were searched, with Google Scholar and citation tracking used as supplementary discovery methods. The search identified 1,132 records; 901 records underwent title and abstract screening, 287 reports were assessed for eligibility, and 32 publications were included. Primary empirical and technical evidence was examined separately from review, conceptual, perspective, and governance literature. Ten fully verified primary empirical studies enabled direct study-level comparison. The strongest evidence came from narrowly defined tasks with explicit reference standards, including motor-skill assessment, biomechanical estimation, markerless motion capture, and athlete tracking. Evidence for injury prediction, wearable systems, generative AI, and athlete digital twins was less mature. Recurring limitations included small or homogeneous samples, single-dataset validation, limited calibration, incomplete reporting of model behaviour, restricted reproducibility, and a lack of prospective or independent evaluation. None of the included publications demonstrated sustained decision impact or attributable improvement in athlete, educational, sports-medicine, or organisational outcomes. Progress will require temporal and external validation, calibrated uncertainty, transparent reporting, representative datasets, interoperable multimodal systems, human oversight, and safeguards for athlete autonomy, privacy, fairness, and contestability.

Utilizing Active Video Games for Accurate Energy Expenditure Assessment in Physically Active Adults

Jorge A Aburto-Corona — 2026-07-15

This study validated the energy expenditure (EE) reported by the active video game (AVG) Fitness Boxing 2: Rhythm & Exercise by comparing it with indirect calorimetry (MC) in 50 university students (21.2 ± 2.0 years). Participants attended the laboratory on two occasions. During the first session, height (165.6 ± 9.1 cm), body weight (68.5 ± 15.6 kg), and maximal oxygen consumption (42.2 ± 8.2 mL/kg/min) were assessed using a progressive treadmill test. In the second session, participants completed 15 minutes of free-mode exercise on the AVG while connected to the metabolic cart, allowing for simultaneous collection of EE from both the game and indirect calorimetry. Heart rate (162.0 ± 20.5 bpm), perceived exertion (11.5 ± 2.5), and enjoyment (73.3 ± 7.3) were also measured. The results showed significant gender differences in EE (p = 0.049). Specifically, EE estimates differed between devices in women (AVG: 110.3 ± 25.3 kcal vs. MC: 95.3 ± 25.3 kcal; p = 0.003). Although no significant differences were observed in men, the moderate correlation coefficient (r = 0.60) and the standard error of measurement (19.5 kcal), which exceeded the minimal detectable change (5.5 kcal), indicate substantial measurement error. Overall, these findings suggest that the AVG presents considerable inaccuracy when estimating EE and therefore should not be used in clinical or diagnostic contexts. However, it may still serve as a useful tool for promoting exercise participation and adherence.