International Journal of Physical Education, Fitness and Sports https://ijpefs.org/index.php/ijpefs The International Journal of Physical Education, Fitness and Sports (IJPEFS) is an international, print / online quarterly journal (ISSN.No: Print (2277-5447) and Online (2457-0753)) published in English. The aim of IJPEFS is to stimulate knowledge to professionals, researchers and academicians working in the fields of Physical Education, Fitness and Sports Sciences. en-US editor-in-chief@ijpefs.org (Shashi Bala Singh, Ph.D., DSc., FNASc., FIAN, FAMS) contact@asianresassoc.org (Support Team) Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.13 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Combined Exercise Methods in Resistance Training: A Brief Review of Acute Responses and Long-Term Adaptations https://ijpefs.org/index.php/ijpefs/article/view/666 <p>The purpose of this article was to review and synthesize the scientific literature on the acute effects and long-term adaptations of combined exercise methods (CEM) compared to traditional strength training (TST), with a focus on performance outcomes, physiological responses, strength gains, and muscle hypertrophy. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, BIREME/BVS, and Google Scholar databases using the following search terms: ‘strength training’ OR ‘resistance training’ AND ‘paired-set’ OR ‘bi-set’ OR ‘tri-set’ OR ‘superset’ OR ‘agonist-antagonist’, in various combinations with the Boolean operators “OR” and “AND”. Studies published in English that compared the effects of combined exercise training with traditional resistance training, evaluated acute physiological or performance-related responses, and investigated adaptations following a training period were included in this review. A total of 49 studies were included in this review, comprising 40 acute studies and 9 longitudinal studies. These studies evaluated metabolic and hormonal responses, electromyographic activity, performance outcomes, strength gains, and muscle hypertrophy. Overall, the findings suggest that CEM produce similar or, in some cases, superior responses compared to TST across several parameters. Thus, such methods represent a valuable alternative for athletes and individuals with limited time availability, as they can still promote significant training adaptations.</p> Diogo Cardozo Copyright (c) 2025 Diogo Cardozo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://ijpefs.org/index.php/ijpefs/article/view/666 Wed, 02 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Characterizing the Physiological Demands & Serum Cortisol Levels of Thru-Hiking the Continental Divide Trail https://ijpefs.org/index.php/ijpefs/article/view/665 <p>The popularity of thru-hiking is expanding within the outdoor recreation industry, drawing attention to the physiological demands of prolonged endurance activities in natural environments. This study examined the effects of a long-distance thru-hike on circadian rhythm regulation, body composition, and physical fitness parameters in two adult subjects who undertook the Continental Divide Trail in 2021. Serum cortisol concentrations were measured in the morning and evening at four time points: pre-hike, mid-hike, post-hike, and 16 weeks post-hike. Physical fitness testing included assessments of body composition, maximal oxygen uptake, and muscular endurance were conducted at pre-hike, post-hike, and 16 weeks post-hike. Both subjects demonstrated significant physiological adaptations, including changes in evening serum cortisol concentrations and alterations in adipose tissue and muscle mass. The female subject showed marked improvements in lower body muscular endurance and maximal oxygen uptake, while the male subject experienced reductions in muscle mass and muscular endurance, while maintaining aerobic capacity. These findings suggest that thru-hiking may influence endocrine function and physical fitness dependent on initial fitness status and individual physiological characteristics. This study highlights the need for further research to better characterize the health impacts of thru-hiking.</p> Hennekens M, Heil D Copyright (c) 2025 Hennekens M, Heil D https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://ijpefs.org/index.php/ijpefs/article/view/665 Fri, 04 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Assessing the Effect of High Intensity Interval Training and Fast Continuous Training on Resting Heart Rate and VO2 Max of Adult Athletes https://ijpefs.org/index.php/ijpefs/article/view/677 <p><em>Background: </em>Cardiovascular fitness, measured through Resting Heart Rate (RHR) and Maximal Oxygen Uptake (VO<sub>2</sub> Max), is critical for optimizing athletic performance. High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Fast Continuous Training (FCT) are two aerobic conditioning modalities widely used to improve cardiovascular efficiency, but their comparative effects remain insufficiently studied in adult competitive athletes. <em>Aim: </em>This study aimed to compare the effects of an 8-week HIIT and FCT program on RHR and VO<sub>2</sub> Max in adult athletes, thereby evaluating the efficacy of each training modality in enhancing aerobic performance. <em>Methods: </em>A randomized controlled trial design was employed involving 90 adult athletes (45 males and 45 females, aged 21-26), randomly located into three groups: HIIT (n=30), FCT (n=30), and Control (n=30). RHR and VO<sub>2 </sub>Max were assessed during pre- and post-intervention using Polar H10 monitors and Vmax Encore Metabolic Cart, respectively. Data were analysed using ANCOVA (Analysis of Covariance) to control for pre-test differences, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc comparison. <em>Results: </em>Post-intervention results revealed statistically significant improvements in both RHR and VO<sub>2</sub> Max across the training groups (<em>p </em>&lt; 0.05). The HIIT group exhibited the most significant reduction in RHR (62.72 bpm) and the highest increase in VO<sub>2</sub> Max (52.12 ml/kg/min), outperforming both FCT (RHR = 65.06 bpm; VO<sub>2</sub> Max = 49.40 ml/kg/min) and the Control group (RHR = 70.32 bpm; VO<sub>2 </sub>Max = 41.28 ml/kg/min). Effect sizes were large for both RHR (η² = 0.950) and VO<sub>2</sub> Max (η² = 0.982), indicating robust model fit. <em>Conclusion: </em>The findings confirm that both HIIT and FCT are effective in improving cardiovascular parameters among adult athletes, with HIIT demonstrating superior efficacy in a shorter duration. These results support the strategic incorporation of HIIT in training regimens aimed at maximizing aerobic performance and cardiovascular health.</p> Manish Acharjee, Priyanshu Prabal Dutta Copyright (c) 2025 Manish Acharjee, Priyanshu Prabal Dutta https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://ijpefs.org/index.php/ijpefs/article/view/677 Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000